Page 8 - 2021 Policy Watch
P. 8
Policy Watch: A Milestone in Legal Development: China Promulgates a Civil Code
the Tort Liability Law and the General Provisions of the a. æ³?????è§???¸æ?è§£é????è°??é¢?
Civil Law, have been incorporated into the Civil Code.
Therefore, these nine laws will cease to be in effect ä¸???½å?主å¸ä¹??å¹³æ??ºï?è¦???¶å?????³æ?
when the Civil Code takes effect. The other 23 laws will äº??æ³?§£???使ä????æ³??????³æ?å¾??å®??
remain effective, with the Civil Code. ç²¾ç?ä¿??ä¸??´ï?ç»??æ°??æ³????????6??¸º
æ¤ï???é«?ººæ°???¢å??¢å??¨å??°è??????591
2. Judicial Interpretations ä»¶å?æ³?§£???139ä»¶æ?导æ?§æ?ä¾?????¥æ?ä¾??
è¡???¢æ?????¨è??°ç??¸æ?è§£é??¶å?å·¥ä?ï¼?¡®
China, as a country with a civil law system, depends ä¿????æ³?????ä¸?æ£ç¡®å®????
largely on codified law. Nevertheless, aside from the
laws and regulations of the national legislative organs, ??é«?ººæ°???¢æ????æ³?§£????ºæ????ï¼????
the judicial authorities issue judicial interpretations ä¸?ï¼??äº??å½??æ¢ç?ï¼????é«?ººæ°???¢å??¤å?
and explanation of the law4 and specify leading cases5. ???审è????å¸??æ¢æ????ç¬??ï¼??äº????¿®
The actions of the judicial institution, particularly the ?¹ç?ï¼?¿®?¹å????交æ?é«?ººæ°???¢å??¤å????
Supreme People?? Court??, is binding on the courts just 审è???????å¸??äº?2021å¹?1??1?¥å??½ã??¸»è¦?
as if it was legislation from the National People?? Con- ???两ç?å½¢å?ï¼?????è¦??å¼?????å¾??ç§°ã??
gress. Therefore, China has a mixed system of codes ?¡æ?åº????¸ª???å???ºä¿®?¹ï?äº??è¿??è¦?¿®
and statutes; together with judicial interpretations and ?¹ä¸ª?????¡¨è¿°ï??????æ?¸ª??????ç¬??ï¼?
leading cases, which comprehensively encompass the å±????¤§ä¿??????³ä?ä½??è¦?¿®?¹å?æ³?§£???
law in China. ç§°ï?è¿??è¦???¶å??¡æ?è¿??大è?模修?¹ï????
???ç±»å?ä¸??æ³?§£???è¡??å¹¶ä¿®?¹ï?æ¯?????
a. Problems of Harmonizing Codes, Statutes and Ju- ????????????????ä¿???????å§»æ??????
dicial Interpretations ?¸æ?è§£é?ç????ç±»å?æ³?§£???è¦??æ¸??å®????
???ä¸??å®?¿®è®¢è??????????å®??ï¼?????
Recently, Xi Jinping, China?? Chairman, required that å±??åº??ä¿??????³ä????æ³?????å®???²ç?
relevant civil judicial interpretations be promptly im- ???æ³?§£???2021å¹?1??1?¥ç»§ç»??????????
proved to be consistent with the Civil Code the relevant å¦?????é«?ººæ°???¢å?äº??????¸??ººæ°????
?½å???????å¹²é?é¢??è§£é?(äº?)???äº?????
4 The Right of Judicial Interpretation of the Supreme People?? Court è§??ï¼????äº?ººä¾?????æ³??ä¸??¾ä?????¡ç?
can be dated back to the Article 33 of the Law on the Organization of äº?????å®??请æ?人æ?æ³??å¢??è¿?º¦???ï¼??
the People?? Courts published on 5th July 1979, which provided that ??????çº???°é?以ä?è¶??å®????¤±é¢?¸º????
??he Supreme People?? Court gives interpretation on questions concern- å¢??è¿?º¦??»¥???å½??人å?请æ?对æ?èµ????¤±
ing specific application of laws and decrees in judicial proceedings.?? ???人æ?æ³??ä¸??????????????????ä¸???
Later, the Resolution of the Standing Committee of the National Peo- ä¸?????¡å??§ã???æ³?????äº?????äº??ï¼??
ple?? Congress Providing an Improved Interpretation of the Law (passed ä¿???¨å?ï¼??ä½????²¡?????????ï¼????é«?
on 10th June 1981). Article 2 reads, ??nterpretation of questions in- ?¢æ²¡????°æ????æ³?§£??????åº????????
volving the specific application of laws and decrees in court trials shall 该å?æ³?§£???款ä??¶æ????ç¬??ï¼?????ä¸??
be provided by the Supreme People?? Court. Interpretation of questions ä»??å¾???¥é??????æ³?§£???å¦???¶ä?æ³??æ?
involving the specific application of laws and decrees in the procurato- ?¨æ????è¦?¿®è®¢ç?ï¼??å®??¥ä?ä¿??ï¼????该æ?
rial work of the procuratorates shall be provided by the Supreme People?? å¾?¿®?¹é?å¸?????åº??è¡??æ³?§£??¿®?¹ï?å¦??
Procuratorate. If the interpretations provided by the Supreme People?? ???æ³???³ç?ä¸???¸æ?è§£é??¡æ???7??
Court and the Supreme People?? Procuratorate have discrepancies in
principle, they shall be submitted to the Standing Committee of the 6 ä¹??å¹?2020å¹?5??29?¥å????å±?¸å¤??æ²»å?ç¬???????
National People?? Congress for interpretation or decision.?? �?�????�
5 The Law on the Organization of the People?? Courts (amended on 7 ??é«?ººæ°???¢ç?ç©¶å???¸»ä»»é????2020å¹?11??27?¥â??
26th October 2018), Article 18 provides that ??he Supreme People?? ???æ³?????????¤§??????ä¼??????¡¨???为â???æ³?
Court may provide interpretations on specific application of law related ?¸å??½ä??¸æ?è§£é?æ¸?????å®?·¥ä½????è®?
to trials. The Supreme People?? Court may issue leading cases.?? This
provision defines the leading cases.
8

