Page 136 - 2017 White Paper
P. 136
7 White Paper on the Business Environment in China

technical investigation review and made the first-instance a real-time scan file software to achieve the function of
judgement that all the plaintiff’s claims were rejected. real-time scan, cross-reference and online-reference of
litigation materials. On this basis, relying on the Shanghai
The difference between technical investigation and Court attorney service platform, the attorney can refer to
technical consultation is that the technical investigator the litigation materials of the case on trial, and thus solve
are trial support personnel who can participate in the the difficulties the attorney has in reading the pending
litigation procedure, especially the trial, but technical case remotely and simultaneously; and
consultation is the activity outside the court and the
opinion from technical consultant is only for reference. (5) strengthening the construction of scientific and
The biggest difference between technical investigator technological court and build up the first comprehensive
and technical expert is that the technical expert jury are high-definition technological court equipped with
people’s assessors and members of the collegial bench remote evidence demonstration function for remote
with the legal jurisdiction while the technical investigator proofing, cross-examining and testifying. The court will
only can participate in the trial or auxiliary trial and attend also install high-definition projection equipment.
the discussion of the collegial bench but cannot vote in
collegial bench. 3. Operation Guidelines about Judicial Authentication
of Technology Fact Involving in Intellectual Property Civil
2. Intellectual Property Litigation System Lawsuit

Shanghai Intellectual Property Court actively Shanghai Intellectual Property Court deliberated
promotes the reform of Litigation System centered on and passed Operation Guidelines about Judicial
trial, including: Authentication ofTechnology Fact Involving in Intellectual
Property Civil Lawsuit. The operation guidelines have 15
(1) setting up the pre-court session working articles in total and mainly clarify the conditions and scope
mechanism where pre-court session will be summoned of judicial authentication for starting up authentication
for part of cases which are difficult, complicated, and of technology facts, appraisement examination, selection
require great attention, and cases for excluding illegal of appraisal agencies, submission of identification of
evidence involving in criminal; material and other procedural matters. The court is
responsible to inform the appraisal institutions’ rights
(2) working out Opinions about Excluding the Illegal and obligations will decide what the opinion will adopt
Evidence, and trying to exclude the illegal evidence as evidence.
before the trial based on trial session and the relevant
evidence, clues, the proof of the prosecution of evidence Beijing Intellectual Property Court
provided by the two sides;
As the first specialized intellectual property court
(3) working out Opinions about Establishing the established in China, Beijing Intellectual Property Court
Diversified Dispute Settlement Mechanism which has received a large number of technical cases involving
Links Up the Litigation and Non-Litigation (trial) and patents, technical secrets, computer software and other
Operation Rules of Litigation and Conciliation (trial), types since its establishment. On October 22nd 2015, the
and Cooperation Agreement of the Diversified Dispute court formally established the technical investigation
Settlement Mechanism which Links Up the Litigation room, actively exploring to improve the technical
and Non-Litigation signed by eight professional social investigator system.
mediation organizations including Shanghai Commercial
Mediation Center, so as to give a full play to the function 1. The Technical Investigator
of mediation organizations, set up mediation evaluation
index, promote mediation organization to orderly In 2016, the Beijing Intellectual Property Court has
compete and effectively evaluate the cases, strengthen 25 technical investigators in total (including 8 exchange
the training and communication of mediation work and technical investigators and 17 part-time technical
fully stimulate the effectiveness of multiple solutions; investigator), who were involved in 250 cases of technical
fact-finding work, including participating in court for
(4) opening the first remote platform for attorneys to 128 cases, participating in preservation and inspection
read the cases on trial around the nation and develop

136
   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141